The Culture Beat

July 16, 2007

Movie Review: Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

Filed under: Books,Movies,Uncategorized — Alex @ 6:51 pm

OOTP
The Harry Potter films have been a franchise distinguished by source novels that are telling one great big story. As such they have singular traits that a recent New York Times article discussed. In following its youthful wizard over a total of seven years, in films all but one of which are made a snug 18 months apart, we get a sense of Harry Potter’s growth from 11-year old into a young adult, in the very specific case of actor Daniel Radcliffe, as well as the other young actors who co-star with him. This was a chancy move by the studio to cast untried youngsters in a series of blockbuster films directed by a handful of different artists. As it turns out, the record-breaking books have become highly profitable film adaptations.

But as each successive book has expanded in length and author J. K. Rowling’s epic fantasy series grows in complexity and depth, the film adaptations can only stay the length of a feature film, at least two hours or more. The Order of the Phoenix was easily the longest of the tomes and, as had happened with earlier volumes, was sure to be chopped, compressed and, using the physics of film adaptation, converted from text to celluloid storytelling with its own conventions and strengths. I go into the Harry Potter films knowing I will get both more and less: more spectacle and the specific surface details that Hollywood production design can create and less of the actual imaginative incidents, character interactions and plot complexity that have made the books unique in publishing history.

But I must say that I was surprised at my response to the Phoenix the film–the plot rolled along at a nice pace, neither too fast nor slow (it’s never too slow in these movies–too much plot to cover), and with scenes that were as good or better than I had imagined as I read the book. Harry in the fifth book is a mess–the teenager has been witness to his mortal enemy Voldemort’s return but the wizarding world’s governing body, the Ministry of Magic, officially denies any such thing, living in such dread of another confrontation with the dark lord that it has willed itself into a state of denial. Harry is publically branded a liar or lunatic and his own headmaster, Albus Dumbledore, seems strangely aloof from the boy who needs his wisdom and council more than ever. So the darkness that setteled over the end of the previous film, Goblet of Fire, only grows with Phoenix and the film’s visual palette is mostly quite dark, to match the emotional tone of the story.

Yes, there are the series’ trademark moments of whimsy and hijinks to break up the gloom but since this is a story about a gathering storm, there is simply no room for much mirth. As the story grows to a climax, I began to recall more and more of the books’ rich details, plot mechanics, characters and motivations and it became harder to overlook the film’s race through the book’s 870 pages. The film’s audience must simply guess at varous implications of and reasons for plot turns. I will admit that though some of the eliminations weren’t missed as even Rowling has admitted that she could have perhaps indulged herself less in the telling.

At the end, instead of the usual necessary concluding explanation by Dumbledore as to what and why things have transpired as they have–a very long passage in the book as there is so much crucial information that needs expositing–we get a very brief scene of the mentor and boy together that barely covers the events that have just rushed by.

So, yes, even though I know in my head that a book is a book with its own virtues and strengths and a movie adapation cannot be a cinematic transcription of it, such marvelous and carefully plotted storytelling as Rowling’s suffers under even the best attempts at adaptation. You simply have to take the films for what they are, not for what they cannot be, (short of careful adaptation into a well-funded television miniseries.) And for those of you who haven’t read the books, stop reading this and get started! You’ve got to catch up before the final volume, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, is released this Saturday, July 21.

Advertisement

4 Comments »

  1. Jesus said be holy as I am holy. reading books on magic and wizardry is not holy nor of God.
    We need to take heed lest we be deceived.
    Jesus said to be the salt of the earth and come out from them and be separate. Many of us are a little too comfortable with our compromise before a holy GOD who gave His only begotten Son. The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom. May the good Lord give you wisdom.
    Respectfully,
    someone who believes. Hebrews 9:27

    Comment by tracey — July 18, 2007 @ 10:51 pm | Reply

  2. I believe the story of Harry Potter is great fun. The continuation of Order of the Phoenix is nothing short of spectacular for the Harry Potter fan. As a christian I believe that fantasy stories such as this are appropriate if presented in an acceptable manner. Lets not forget Chronicles of Narnia by CS Lewis. I think that in itself is a perfect example of fantasy acceptable by the christian community. As long as these stories are kept in perspective they should be viewed as no more than a fun storyline that brings every childhood thought to life.

    Comment by Justin — July 19, 2007 @ 12:14 am | Reply

  3. Tracy,
    Thanks for your comments. I completely understand how you would see the Potter stories as delving into witchcraft, a real practice forbidden by the Bible. However, reading the Potter books, it becomes apparent that this make-believe world has nothing to do with real witchcraft, being rather a storytelling device, like The Chronicles of Narnia’s fantasy tales, for exploring Rowling’s themes of courage and sacrifice. A good explanation for this is at that bastion of Christian orthodoxy, Christianity Today in an article written by John Granger, a highly devout Christian teacher who was concerned when his daughter wanted to read a Harry Potter book. Seeking to show her the errors of the book, he read the first book and began to realize they were not about real witchcraft at all. Granger argues that the books in fact display profoundly Christian symbolism throughout. So, if you want to take a look at someone’s honest examination of the books, go to:
    http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/commentaries/sacrificialboywizard.html

    I found that I was wrong about the books after I actually began to read them for myself.

    Comment by Alex — July 19, 2007 @ 9:57 am | Reply

  4. harry potter rules and nobody can chancge that for me!!!

    Comment by abel — January 14, 2008 @ 3:24 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.