<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bless the children &#8230; because the tabloids sure don&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theculturebeat.com/2008/01/02/450/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theculturebeat.com/2008/01/02/450/</link>
	<description>Movies, TV, Faith, Comics, Books, Media, etc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:22:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://theculturebeat.com/2008/01/02/450/#comment-2111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theculturebeat.com/?p=450#comment-2111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a fair question, and a fair point. Since I don&#039;t religiously -- or irreligiously -- follow the tabloid press, I haven&#039;t kept score on which kids they seem to target. But if that correlation holds true, then I&#039;d say that&#039;s the third party complicit in this trend: the periodicals, the parents, and, of course, the readers. I take it as another sign of cultural hypocrisy when it comes to children.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fair question, and a fair point. Since I don&#8217;t religiously &#8212; or irreligiously &#8212; follow the tabloid press, I haven&#8217;t kept score on which kids they seem to target. But if that correlation holds true, then I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s the third party complicit in this trend: the periodicals, the parents, and, of course, the readers. I take it as another sign of cultural hypocrisy when it comes to children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://theculturebeat.com/2008/01/02/450/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theculturebeat.com/?p=450#comment-2112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to wonder how much certain celebrities have brought this on themselves.  There are actually some big stars and personalities who don&#039;t regularly appear in the tabloids and personality mags, who maintain some sort of decorous private life.  They&#039;re the &quot;dogs that don&#039;t bark,&quot; to quote Sherlock Holmes.  Do most of the examples of celebrities who are perennial tabloid fodder those who have sought the spotlight and now must keep getting that addictive charge--even for bad behavior, since bad attention is better than none--and thus make their whole family fair game to the amoral gossip press?  Just askin&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder how much certain celebrities have brought this on themselves.  There are actually some big stars and personalities who don&#8217;t regularly appear in the tabloids and personality mags, who maintain some sort of decorous private life.  They&#8217;re the &#8220;dogs that don&#8217;t bark,&#8221; to quote Sherlock Holmes.  Do most of the examples of celebrities who are perennial tabloid fodder those who have sought the spotlight and now must keep getting that addictive charge&#8211;even for bad behavior, since bad attention is better than none&#8211;and thus make their whole family fair game to the amoral gossip press?  Just askin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

