The Culture Beat

September 6, 2008

Thank God for evolution. Huh?

Filed under: Books,Faith Issues,Science — Culture Beat @ 4:12 pm

darwin_as_ape.jpg

“Nothing matters more at this time in history than what people think about evolution.”

We might expect that kind of universal claim to come from a passionate evangelist, and in a way that’s correct. Except that this preacher, Michael Dowd, says evolution is the good news.

Dowd, ordained in the United Church of Christ, and his wife of seven years, science writer Connie Barlow, travel the country full-time, preaching and teaching a surprising message: Rather than threaten or undermine faith, evolution can sustain, inform and even motivate religious belief.

“Both of us have this passion of telling the story of evolution in an inspiring way,” Dowd explained in a phone conversation this week. “We share the same purpose of communicating a science-based vision of the universe in a religious way.” (Dowd is pictured below. That guy caricatured above is a cartoon version of Charles Darwin — just in case you were sleeping through high school and college biology and the last 155 years.)

dowd10b.jpg

They bring their message to Northeast Tennessee on Sunday, Monday and Tuesday, speaking at Holston Valley Unitarian-Universalist Church and First Presbyterian Church in Elizabethton. (For details, contact the Rev. Jacqueline Luck at (423) 477-7661 or the Rev. John Shuck at (423) 543-7737.) Dowd published a 430-page book last fall with an eye-catching title: “Thank God for Evolution: How the Marriage of Science and Religion Will Transform Your Life and Our World” (Viking). He also runs a Web site.

His missionary zeal for “evolutionary theology” comes from a conviction that evolution itself provides meaning to existence by creating – yes, creating – a “holy trajectory” from simplicity to ever-greater complexity.

“Humans are part of that process,” Dowd said. “The universe became complex enough so that it could be aware of itself. We’re not separate from nature. It’s nature becoming aware of itself.”

He believes that as religious traditions accept this understanding, “they’ll see their truths are more real, more visceral.” This view of the cosmos stands in contrast with evolutionary thinking that leaves little room for purpose or meaning.

“When I talk to conservative audiences,” Dowd said, “I tell them they’re right to reject evolution mostly as a chance, purposeless process. I present evolution in a God-glorifying, Christ-edifying, Scripture-honoring way.”

In his view, humans represent a high-water mark in evolutionary development: we are conscious of ourselves and seek relationships not only with other humans but with the “ultimate reality” itself. In Dowd’s vocabulary, the proper name we give that ultimate reality is God.

Language is another bridge linking science and religion, according to Dowd. When we understand how language developed, he said, “All concepts of God and religion make complete sense.”

All societies grow up with what he calls “night language … the language of dreams and metaphors that humans have used through their history to explain the world.

“These stories speak deep subjective truth,” he said. “The story of the fall in the Garden of Eden – that’s profoundly true in night language. Then science comes along … and puts down night language, speaks only in ‘day language,’ which is literal and fact-based. Myths are pushed aside. Of course the religionists react against that.”

But the two “languages” not only exist together. They help interpret each other.

“Science and religion cannot be only reconciled – that’s lame,” Dowd said. “There’s mutual enhancing. The scientific enterprise can’t avoid the question of meaning, or it goes off into destruction. The Nazis showed us that. Religion is enriched by being grounded in the world of day language and concepts.”

At first glance, this sounds like the old argument that science and religion operate in different spheres and answer different questions. But not really: Dowd wants to “marry” science and religion, not divorce them. To him, scientific study is a spiritual discipline and religious belief must be informed by science. (“Facts are God’s native tongue,” he likes to say.)

Thinking of evolution as the great purpose of existence, directing us to a God as “the ultimate reality,” doesn’t fit easily with long-held beliefs. Dowd’s most persistent criticism comes from “those who take their metaphors literally.” (His book includes about 120 endorsements from religious leaders, philosophers and scientists, including five Nobel laureates. Theologically conservative Christian, Jewish and Islamic scholars are notable by their absence.)

But look at the world through this lens, says Dowd, and we can see a 21st-century road to salvation.

“Evolution understood in a sacred, meaningful way is really good news,” Dowd said. “It bridges all those old divides between head and heart, between science and religion.”

First published in the Johnson City (Tenn.) Press, 6 Sept. 2008.

bookcover-197.jpg

Advertisement

3 Comments »

  1. Why does everything I read having to do with religion sound like a con? From believing the nonsense of the earth being 6000 years old (are you kidding me) to this new idea of overexcited, overblown conclusions that God made evolution, I have really had it with so called religious leaders. give me a break, I am waiting for the understanding of God to be explined. From what we all see, it’s been a big no show, which is why people are confused. How about a book on what Jesus was really talking about; Giving and stop the big show. Help the needy and stop being so success oriented and greedy. I have yet to see someone talk about the need for our understanding of what Gods love means. Jesus said God is spirit, not Santa Clause, not some bs about when the planet was made. Spirit of truth, love and giving. Really simple, all inclusive for EVERYONE and get off the damn podium, get over yourselves and get your hands dirty.

    Comment by anna farawell — September 10, 2008 @ 7:57 pm | Reply

  2. I think Mr. Dowd’s ideas are thoughtful and idyllic. But I’m afraid I cannot see them as anything more than that.

    The call for the return to a classical integration of science and religion is wonderful! Yes, let us return to an intellectual tradition that see the various disciplines more unified.

    However, the idea that Evolution and Biblical Christianity can be combined into one grandiose understanding of the universe implies that Evolution (macro-evolution) is hard science, a sound presupposition, something we could stake our lives on. Which it is not.

    The theories put forth by Darwin are not fact. These theories are largely disproved, and hotly debated by well-trained scientists everywhere.

    Yes, head and heart should be unified. It follows then that science and religion should be also. I wholeheartedly agree with Dowd on that point. But our presuppositions should be sound or the conclusions we draw from them will not be. Evolution is not a sound presupposition. And a faulty presupposition will not unify anything.

    Comment by Rebecca Silva — September 11, 2008 @ 4:33 am | Reply

  3. Except that evolution would require for the Sun to be created before the plants. However the Bible states that on the third day all the vegetation was created, and on the fourth day the Sun was created.

    Also Romans 5:12 says, “Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.” Meaning there was no death before Adam sinned (mind you, plants aren’t living in the Biblical sense [no breath, or blood], so eating plants isn’t death for the plants). Evolution REQUIRES death to work.

    These are just a few example about how Evolution (note when I referred to evolution in this reply I mean macro-evolution) and Christianity don’t mix.

    Don’t believe the lie.

    Comment by Haiden — September 11, 2008 @ 3:19 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.