The Culture Beat

December 4, 2006

Joseph

Filed under: Books,Movies — Culture Beat @ 6:09 pm

christ the lord webJust a quick note here. I haven’t seen The Nativity Story yet. Most of the reviews I’ve read haven’t been kind to the film, most categorizing it as rather bland. I was watching Ebert and Roeper last night, though, and Roeper gave it a marginal thumbs up. He agreed that it was boring, but both Roeper and guest reviewer Peter Sagal, who gave it a thumbs down, thought that the most interesting part of the story was Joseph. What would it have been like to be Joseph, who in the beginning didn’t have a miraculous visitation and had to believe by faith? Both agreed that the movie could have been less boring if the filmmakers had focused more on Joseph.

It’s true that Joseph often doesn’t get his due. If you are looking for an excellent treatment of Joseph, give Anne Rice’s Christ The Lord: Out of Egypt a try. While the story begins later than the Nativity events, Rice does an outstanding job of capturing Joseph’s character. He is humble and modest, gentle yet manly, aware that his son is beyond him and yet also aware — and obedient to the fact — that he bears the responsibility of raising this unique boy to manhood. The story, of course, isn’t about Joseph. (It’s told in first person from Jesus’ point of view; Rice does a fabulous job.) But after reading Rice’s account, one can visualize how Jesus would have “grown in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and men.”

December 2, 2006

Here, here for Cher, Cher!

Filed under: Books,Movies,Uncategorized — Alex @ 12:00 pm

cherbook 11924

Our very own Cher has received some nice recognition. Let me demonstrate:

Several days ago, CBSNews.com’s Blogophile, in an article reporting on the blogosphere’s reaction to the new James Bond film, Casino Royale, linked to Cher’s review, (a few posts down on this page) and quoted from it as well. This is also an honor for The Culture Beat because out of all the tens of millions of blogs and all the websites, and all the chat rooms in the world, she walks into our little one and picks Cher’s piece as one of the six she quotes.

But that’s not all. Infuze, the great popular culture site that is an excellent way of keeping up with breaking news, has two Cher sightings. She’s a published novelist and has been one of their reviewers for a while and she is interviewed on her writing and here is a review of her recent novel, Justified Means. It’s always nice to get a pat on the back and it’s wonderful to see Cher’s work get some overdue attention. The novel’s cover is our illustration here since I don’t have a handy shot of our gal to put up.

October 5, 2006

Still looking for a Pottery Ban

Filed under: Books,General Pop Culture,Movies,Uncategorized — Alex @ 3:48 pm

Harry Potter

The Associated Press reports on the persistence of parental resistance to the Harry Potter books, a trend that had seemingly died out after six books and four hit feature films since the first book published in 1999. Conservative Christians accused the books of indoctrinating children into the occult or romanticizing witchcraft. Some accuser also charged Harry with being a bad role model for his breaking of school rules at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, such as sneaking about the corridors after lights out in his invisibility cloak to investigate mysteries. But as the books continued to set sales records and the plots revealed that author J. K. Rowling was actually telling one grand and epic story with a very complex and flawed hero, the level of criticism from evangelical circles declined. In fact one Christian teacher, John Granger, published a staunch defense of the Harry Potter series claiming that they in fact are designed to, like C. S. Lewis’ Chronicles of Narnia, baptize the imagination of young (and older) readers who are getting a literary vision of a progressively more purified soul. Granger points out how the books are filled with ancient symbols of Christ such as the phoenix, the “resurrection bird” who dies and rises again and whose tears heal Harry’s mortal wound. The next film adaptation is of the fifth book, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.

Thus the Atlanta mother’s accusation is news if only because it is a late echo of the earlier chorus. Readers of my earlier post know that I have found great edification and entertainment in the Harry Potter series and have overcome whatever qualms I had when I realized that the books use magical content as framing plot device in which we can see with new eyes the challenges every person must undergo to grow into someone of virtuous characters and that this journey is at times both joyous and full of wonder but also baffling, painful and trying to the extreme. There is every difference between the real world of the occult with its lust for power and pagan doctrines and Rowling’s often fanciful and funny world of dragons, house elves and invisibility cloaks–and resurrection birds. .

August 29, 2006

Another non-electronic media week?

Filed under: Books,General Pop Culture,Uncategorized — Alex @ 8:30 pm

USHAE 2006 08 29 23 JPG

When I moved to West Palm Beach, FL in summer of 2004, we were greeted by the welcoming comittee of Ivan and Jean, two hurricanes of several that hit the state in several places. It seems we had arrived just in time to see the changing of the cycles that run for several decades–and we were heading back to a pattern of greater and more frequent hurricanes. Last year, Wilma ploughed through south FL from west to east leaving us without power for almost five full days. We learned to put up aluminum shutters and shop on tax-free weeks for items designated as hurricane supplies (we do find ourselves dipping into some of these provisions as the long hurricane season grinds along.) So now the first strong tropical storm is here, Ernesto, at the time of this writing, moving onto the penisula and heading up the middle of the state to the west of Lake Okeechobee before veering northeast and going up the coast. It’s not supposed to attain hurricane status in Florida but a strong tropical storm can still have gusts up to 70 mph which we could see in the next 15 to 20 hours. We haven’t boarded up–my wife is working today at her hospice floor at a nearby hospital and has volunteered to stay the night since the storm may prevent the next day’s shift from getting there.

We are hoping we won’t regret not covering the windows and there’s a chance we’ll lose power so for the first time, we’ve got a generator, five plastic containers of gas in the garage, which makes me uncomfortable, and I may get to find out how to run power chords to our appliances to keep food frozen and refrigerated, run a microwave and a light and maybe a television (but the more you use, the faster the generator burns gas.)

So what does any of this have to do with culture? During Wilma, we were thrown into quasi-19th century conditions. No electricity, which means no modern media, only the print kind often read by flashlights. Life slows down and is in one sense, not unpleasant. We might have a few days of that again and I certainly am not likely to be posting anything for a while. So hang in there and pray for a rapid and safte resolution of south Florida’s latest atmospheric event.

August 22, 2006

A Doggedly Popular Bestseller

Filed under: Books,Uncategorized — Alex @ 1:54 pm

home book

Well, I joined the thousands if not millions of readers who have read a most unlikely best seller. Published last October, it holds the number one non-fiction hardback spot ten months later. Marley & Me isn’t about a friend’s reminiscence of the famous Reggae singer; it’s about a dog. A big doofus of a Labrador Retriever–the book‘s subtitle captures it: “Life and Love with the World’s Worst Dog.” John Grogan and his wife Jenny were newlyweds when they decided they would try preparing themselves for the daunting prospect of parenthood by acquiring a pet dog. The Lab puppy they brought home had all his papers but they were not prepared for the outrageous behavior that little-but-not-for-long Marley would exhibit from the first week. Extremely “outgoing,” Marley was always bounding around the house, eager to play with his masters and anything he could grab and tear to bits, including pillows and shoes, a habit he never lost. Always hungry, he helped himself to anything that caught his eye, swallowing seemingly inedible items whole which would eventally pass through to be deposited outside in the yard or on walks. Terrified of thunderstorms, he could claw and chew his way through wooden doors or drywall when left in the garage. But Marley was a loving and loyal dog and taught Grogan much about enjoying life. For most of Marley’s life, the Grogans lived in south FL in West Palm Beach, where I reside. Today I drove past their old house on Churchill Street and took a picture of the house where Marley wrought so much havoc.
Groganhouse
Marley even gained a little bit of movie immortality when cast in a family film, The Last Home Run that went nowhere and may be hard to find but whose Marley scenes can be found–where else?–at YouTube. I will not be surprised to hear that the book has been optioned for production as a movie or even a television series. It sure worked for James Herriot’s All Creatures Great and Small, another product of an animal lover with great descriptive skills. The books website is a good introduction.

What might have been a good five-minute read in a Reader’s Digest article, has, because of Grogan’s skill at describing his 13 years with Marley, become an enormous publishing phenomenom. This interview with Grogan sheds more light on the best seller. Readers relate to the joys and exasperations of dog ownership and how certain pets truly become part of the family.

August 1, 2006

Because You Asked . . .

Filed under: Books — Culture Beat @ 7:37 pm

1413798462It’s a strange thing. Write a book about knights and wizards, and no one asks you about your personal life or if you have ever wielded a sword before. Write a book about stealing, and, well, you get asked. Here are my answers.

1. Is Justified Means based on a true story?
Define true.

2. Do you steal things?
Define steal.

Okay, just kidding. Enough of that. Let me just take a moment to address concerns for those of you who have asked. My book Justified Means is a fictionalized account of very real emotions. No, I am not actually married to a pastor. And no, I haven’t stolen anything since grade school when I shop-lifted a pack of gum and felt so guilty that I almost made myself sick. I do, however, have an autistic son (who is also blind, but I thought that was a bit much for a novel). Justified Means was not only my own catharsis (long over-due), but a way of recognizing that people deal with grief in different ways. As I say near the end of the book, people use a variety of means to anesthetize their pain. Kat used stealing.

Many Christians, when faced with someone who is dealing with pain, will say, “Turn to God.” That’s good advice once we realize that God isn’t going to take away the pain. He won’t abandon us, and he may even put people in our lives to walk with us. But he won’t eliminate the pain that living in this fallen and groaning world entails. As Tom McMahon, who knows greatly about pain and children, said, “You gotta play out the season.” And you gotta know who holds your hand.

For those of you who have read Justified Means, thanks. And thanks for asking. If you haven’t read it and wonder what all this has been about, you can read chapter 1 here.

July 8, 2006

How American Higher Education Left Christianity Behind

Filed under: Books,Uncategorized — Alex @ 9:27 am

Stanford chapel
(Stanford University chapel pictured)

One reason I haven’t posted recently is I’ve been frantically reading a really big book, The Soul of the American University, by George M. Marsden, in time for a faculty colloquium that ran for the last two days. Various faculty at my school, Palm Beach Atlantic University, meet at these occasions and spend two days going deep into the text of notable and classic books to grapple with their meanings and themes. Last year I went to one on Dante’s Paradiso, and it was wonderful to go through the sublime medieval masterpiece and catch a glimpse of the mind and art of a poet who could so brilliantly take readers ever higher into heavenly things.

This week’s book is more down to earth, alas, being a history of American higher education that takes you, as the subtitle says, “from Protestant Establishment to Established Nonbelief.” It explains in great detail how the early American colleges (such as Harvard and Yale) founded as Christian institutions gradually eliminated any specific faith content from their curricula or missions. It is a reminder that the struggle to keep Christ and good doctrine at the core of culture and learning is a unending project.

The problem in the colonies was that these schools were usually begun with the idea that no one sect (denomination) was big enough to dominate a school’s character or mission and thus these Protestant schools generalized their Christianity and sought to make it serve a new and growing nation. Thus the aims of the Protestant faith and American nation became intertwined and eventually so identical that the church was indistinct from the nation. Since you can’t really confuse the eternal (church) with the temporal (an earthly nation), something’s go to go, and so gradually, over time, Christianity at these and then other pioneering schools, became so broadly defined that it was possible to eventually marginalize it which then led to it becoming superfluous. The twentieth century saw the rise of the large universities designed to serve government and business with their vast research missions that focused on the growth of factual knowledge but lacked any values other than materialistic ones. Christianity, being a supernaturally-based religion, like all other non-scientifically-based ways of thinking and living, is rejected by the academy. Marsden ends the book with a call for allowing religiously-based scholarship back to the table to supply the diversity of thought that universities say they want but rarely allow.

This is one of the most challenging books I’ve read in years and at times depressing, so inevitable did the secularizing revolution seem to have been. Now that we live in a time of academic barreness regarding any unifying beliefs that would give meaning to all the knowledge we have gained, perhaps allowing faith-informed thinking to compete in colleges and universities is the next big revolution.

June 2, 2006

Does this argument hold water?

Filed under: Books,Science,Uncategorized — Alex @ 2:24 pm

fetus

A recent opinion piece from the Wall Street Journal‘s online site argues that there’s room for compromise in setting abortion policy. Hoover Institute Fellow Peter Berkowitz, in critiquing National Review writer Ramesh Ponnuru’s book, The Party of Death, says that Ponnuru is asking too much by insisting that, because abortion is murder, from the moment of conception to birth, there is a developing human child that must be protected, no exceptions.

But Berkowitz lost me when I came to this paragraph:

At the core of “The Party of Death” is the argument that an embryo has the same claim on us as a newborn child because, from the moment of conception, it contains the genetic structure of a unique human being. It doesn’t matter to Mr. Ponnuru that this argument flies in the face of a complex intuition that seems to underlie the American ambivalence: Invisible to the naked eye, lacking body or brain, feeling neither pleasure nor pain, radically dependent for life support, the early embryo, though surely part of the human family, is distant and different enough from a flesh-and-blood newborn that when the early embryo’s life comes into conflict with other precious human goods or claims, the embryo’s life may need to give way. Deciding just which goods and claims are compelling is, of course, agonizingly difficult but does not, in itself, place one beyond the pale.

Either one believes that life begins at conception and thus, destroying that life is simply wrong and not open to compromise, or I suppose you must believe that at a certain point, the status of a life worthy of protection emerges during the nine-month period (although, with the defence of partial-birth abortion, even a child viable outside of the womb can be killed, so the courts have even upheld that atrocity). Berkowitz doesn’t specify what “other precious human goods or claims” trump the life of the child and I fear that leaving this so vague puts us back in a de facto system of abortion upon deman. The nature of life and death are inherently absolute and thus I find it difficult to entertain or even understand Berkowitz’ notions of compromise on this issue.

May 15, 2006

Men With Guns

Filed under: Books,Politics — Culture Beat @ 6:04 pm

As you’ve probably heard, the president is expected to announce tonight that he intends “to send thousands of National Guard troops to help seal the nation’s southern border against illegal immigrants.” To that end, he spent most of today trying to assuring Mexican president Vincente Fox Quesada that he

“considers Mexico a friend and that what is being considered is not militarization of the border but support of Border Patrol capabilities on a temporary basis by National Guard personnel . . .”

Yeah, right.

I’ll get straight to the point: this is a terrible idea. If there were a Hall of Fame for Terrible Ideas, this would get in on the first ballot. Unanimously.

Why? At least three reasons:

It’s unnecessary. As Luis Alberto Urrea chronicled in “The Devil’s Highway,” the U.S.-Mexico border is, in a sense, already militarized. That is, it’s already patroled by men with guns : the Border Patrol, local, state and tribal (Tohono O’Odham) police and even a Marine base. The idea that “National Guard personnel,” i.e., troops, are needed to support “Border Patrol capabilities on a temporary basis” is risible. What’s needed are more Border Patrol officers.

It’s insufficient. At least politically-speaking. If the president and Karl Rove think that dispatching “National Guard personnel” to the border would satisfy the Tom Tancredo/Michelle Malkin part of the “base,” they should be required to submit a urine sample. Just last week, a part of this wing (that sound you hear is my back snapping in two as I bend over backwards to be fair) debated whether the president should be impeached for “his failure to stop the ‘Mexican invasion’ and protect our nation’s borders.” I somehow doubt that folks who call what’s happening an “invasion” will be satisfied with the president’s proposed actions. In fact, Malkin has already called the as-of-yet-undelivered address part of a “homeland security dog-and-pony charade.”

It’s dangerous. As Urrea tells us, patroling the U.S.-Mexico border requires more than showing up with a bunch of guns and other hardware: it requires an intimate knowledge of both the unforgiving terrain and the people coming across the border. The desert can and will kill you, as it does hundreds of would-be immigrants every year. The Arizona desert is such an efficient killer than, as one agent told Urrea, he isn’t that worried about any would-be terrorist entering the country that way. As he put it, they may be from “desert countries but they’re not from this desert.”

In this setting, it’s hard to imagine what sending National Guardsmen from, say, Iowa, Arkansas or New Jersey will accomplish. Actually, there is one thing I can imagine: a picture of an American soldier pointing a rifle at an unarmed Mexican national. Better yet — if you’re Reuters — a Mexican woman; make her pregnant. And if one of them happens to shoot said unarmed civilian, well, if you think they hate us now, just wait.

Being from Texas, the president cannot not know any of this. But, as Professor Stephen Bainbridge reminds us, the president has “zero political capital,” so instead of “rational” and “humane” approaches to the problem, we’ll more likely get M16A2s pointed out at civilians armed with water bottles and tortillas.

April 29, 2006

Infuze Magazine’s DVC blog

Filed under: Books,Movies — Culture Beat @ 12:42 pm

davinci onesheetThe Da Vinci Code, coming to theaters in May, could be the biggest hit of the summer. First, Ron Howard generally draws out crowds (with the exception of Cinderella Man — but then Russell Crowe is no Tom Hanks as far as likability). Second, Dan Brown’s book spent over three years on bestsellers’ lists and had debuted in the #1 spot on the New York Times list (I’m sure there’s some sort of conspiracy there.)

If you’re wondering what all the fuss is about, or if you want to get some good information on the movie before it comes out, check out Infuze Magazine’s blog on The DaVinci Code. And keep your eye on this blog in the coming weeks for more articles on the book and film.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.